Creating a fair recruiter commission structure is crucial for a recruiting business. That’s because your compensation strategy directly impacts your bottom line and your team’s motivation.
The planning requires some intense reflection, data-crunching, and digging into deep insights. Given how much your recruiters work to close deals and bring in business, you need to make sure they’re being leveled out with the needs of the rest of your agency.
Today, we’ll be looking at what makes a good recruiter commission structure and sharing some examples from within the recruiting industry.
A recruiter commission structure is a plan that outlines how an agency compensates their team of recruiters.
The best way to look at it is the sales rep compensation model. Like sales agents, Recruiters get paid for their performance in the form of commissions weaved around deals closed—with success measured based on parameters such as placements made and/or seniority level.
Implementing a commission-based structure for your team of recruiters can be beneficial for your agency in many ways:
Despite the benefits, a commission-based compensation structure can result in recruiters prioritizing quick placements over long-term fit. Plus, it’s important to analyze if this approach actually aligns with your needs and values.
The right structure for compensating your recruiters can vary—there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. However, there are some typical structures that are almost always used in the recruitment industry.
A base salary plus commission is the most classic form of a recruiting commission structure. In this structure, agencies pay their recruiters a base salary plus commission on every successful placement.
The standard base salary to commission ratio is 60:40, where 60% is a recruiter’s base salary and 40% is the commission they earn.
Pros | Cons |
More financial stability for the team as they get a fixed monthly income | Recruiters may settle for the base salary they get and overlook the benefits of pushing beyond their limits to earn a commission. |
It promotes a positive work culture where the team is motivated to perform without the pressure to earn | If recruiters have not been performing or it’s slow at your end, base salaries can affect the profitability of your agency. |
A fixed salary can create a more collaborative and less competitive environment, fostering teamwork and knowledge-sharing | Top-performing recruiters might lack motivation where earnings are capped, unlike a pure commission model with no ceiling. |
Under this commission plan, agencies offer varying commission rates based on performance levels. This structure can be used in conjunction with base salary or on its own for commission-only reps.
Ideally, the commission is based on factors such as:
Pros | Cons |
Clear incentives motivate recruiters to surpass their targets and earn higher commissions | The process can become too competitive, which can lead to unhealthy competition among recruiters. |
The possibility of earning more by hitting higher tiers ensures that recruiters do not become complacent after a few successful placements. | It may cause a disparity in earnings between top performers and those who struggle to reach higher tiers. |
It helps retain top-performing recruiters. | The pressure to continuously achieve higher tiers can lead to recruiter burnout. |
In this kind of arrangement, there’s no fixed pay, and recruiters get paid only after making successful placements. So, when a recruiter successfully places a candidate, the agency will charge a placement fee to the client while the recruiter receives a specified percentage of that.
Pros | Cons |
It can be cost-effective for startups. | It’s difficult to retain your recruiters for long—especially those who prefer some kind of stability with their incomes. |
Those who are skilled in recruiting can make a lot more money than they would with a fixed pay package. | Recruiters might adopt a tendency to focus on the quantity of placements rather than the quality. |
This structure is aimed at making recruiters think and act like entrepreneurs, who must be proactive, resourceful, and self-motivated. | When recruiters work under 100% commission structures they tend to be less likely to share leads or collaborate. It results in highly competitive environments that are hard for them to thrive in. |
A threshold is the amount of revenue a recruiter needs to bill before they can start earning a commission. For example, a recruiter billed $60,000 i.e. recruited a candidate with this much annual salary, and the threshold is $45,000, here’s how the commission will be calculated:
Commissionable Revenue= $60,000 – $45,000 = $15,000
Commission earned = 10% of $15,000 = $1500
Approach 1: Multiplying the base salary
Monthly Base Salary: $5,000
Multiplier: 9 (A standard number)
Revenue = 5000 x 9 = $45,000
This means a recruiter needs to bill $45,000 in revenue in a given timeframe before they start earning commissions.
Approach 2: Flat figure
This is usually a fixed figure a recruiter needs to bill before earning commissions, regardless of their base salary.
Pros | Cons |
This is a great way of avoiding mediocre performance. | Recruiters have to wait until they can actually earn some commission. |
This structure aligns recruiters’ efforts with the company’s financial goals, as they need to reach a certain level of revenue before earning additional compensation. | Higher base salaries mean higher thresholds, which often set unrealistic/difficult targets for recruiters. |
Recruiters with lower base salaries may find it harder to surpass the fixed threshold compared to a proportional multiplier method |
In this system, you pay your recruiters an advance payment against their future commissions. It can be of 2 types:
Monthly Draw = $3,000
Commission Rate = 10%
Monthly Revenue Generated = $40,000
Commission earned= 10% of $40,000 = $4,000
Payable Commission = $4000 – $3000 = $1000
Pros | Cons |
The fixed draw offers a safety net, while the commission component acts as a motivation to push limits. | A recoverable draw may inflict debt on underperforming recruiters over multiple pay cycles. |
A draw serves as a benchmark for recruiters to target every month. | Draw commissions are often set lower than base salaries. So they only guarantee minimum payouts. |
Recruiter’s salary | Commission range |
£20k – £30k | 10% – 20% |
£30k – £60k | 10% – 30% |
£60k – £70k | 15% – 50% |
Type of commission structure | Commission range |
Non-recoverable draw system | 25% – 35% |
Recoverable draw system | 30% – 40% |
100% commission-based system | 50% – 85% |
Level of hire | Commission range | Recruiter’s salary |
Entry-level hire | 15% – 25% | $45,000 to $60,000 |
Experienced hire | 20% – 30% | $55,000 to $75,000 |
Executive-level roles | 25% – 30% | $70,000 to $110,000 |
Type of role | Criteria | Commission range |
Tech and IT roles | Based on the number of roles or the amount recruiters bill | 15% – 33% |
Executive search roles | A percentage of what the agency charges for a candidate’s annual or half-yearly salary | 30% – 35% |
Type of recruiter | Amount they bill | Commission range |
360 or a full life-cycle recruiter | £100k – £500k | 33% |
180 recruiter (Business Development Managers, Account Managers, Resources, and Delivery Consultants) | Revenue generated from a new client | 2% – 15% |
The first step is to analyze your current recruitment process and team dynamics to identify bottlenecks in your compensation models and productivity levels.
Ask yourself these questions:
Remember, it’s important to choose a compensation structure that motivates your team, drives performance, and helps you smash your agency’s goals.
But first, settle on a fair base salary—something that’s modest (not too much and not too little!). Always, make sure there’s enough room for growth that your recruiters can achieve by hitting more targets and billing more every month or quarter.
Once you have that settled, determine when you should introduce the concept of commissions.
Do you want your entry-level recruiters to first learn the ropes and get into the grind before they can go for the bigger challenge? Or do you want to ensure they surpass a minimum revenue or your cost per seat before their commission kicks in?
Not to forget, you can choose between other low-risk commission structures that are either 100% commission-based with no base salaries or tiered structures that reward recruiters solely on the basis of their performance.
Another point to consider here is to ensure the cost incurred by your agency in hiring a recruiter is covered before you start paying a hefty sum of commissions to them.
Cost of seat refers to the total cost your agency will have to incur to accommodate each recruiter. This doesn’t just include the salary, but the costs associated with providing them with the necessary resources and support.
Start by calculating the total operational costs, which include:
Subtract the total salaries of your recruiters from the total costs and divide the remaining amount by the number of recruiters in your agency.
Example: Total Operational Costs: $1,000,000
Salaries of recruiters: $500,000
Number of recruiters: 10
Cost per seat = ($1,000,000 – $500,000) /10 = $50,000
Once you have the cost per seat, add the base salary of the recruiter to this amount. This will give you the minimum revenue a recruiter must generate to start contributing to your agency’s profitability. It’s generally a good idea to base your threshold commission structure around this amount
The next step to pay attention to is determining how often to roll out commissions to your recruiters. Not only does it help you manage your business cashflows effectively, but also prepares you for unexpected financial strain.
The most common among recruitment agencies is monthly payout (over 80% of TRN members pay monthly to their recruiters). However, when determining the right payment cycle for your agency, you must consider your average deal cycle.
If a deal takes months to close, a quarterly commission payout might work best for you. For example, if it takes longer to receive payments from a client, it’s wise to wait until you get that payment to start distributing commissions.
Benefit
Quarterly commissions provide a more comprehensive view of a recruiter’s performance and contribution over time.
If your recruitment deals typically close within a few weeks, a monthly commission payment schedule is appropriate. Needless to say, recruiters love being rewarded promptly for their services.
Benefit
Timely rewards that match the effort and duration of the recruitment process help maintain recruiter motivation and retention.
If you have 360 recruiters handling an account all by themselves, the commission structure becomes pretty straightforward—you pay them a percentage of what you earned from a client. However, when multiple stakeholders come into the picture, the approach changes.
Besides the recruiter, there could be an account manager or another recruiter involved, taking care of a part of the process for one candidate. In this case, you’ll need to split the commission between the parties based on their level of contribution.
Here, you need to take 3 factors into account:
This is when Recruiter A sources the candidate and Recruiter B recruits the candidate. Should the commission be divided 50-50 among the two?
No. In this case, recruiting is more time-consuming and requires more effort, so it’ll be given more weightage than sourcing. But how much?
2 situations apply here:
Recruiter B gets a 60% share of the commission and Recruiter A gets 40%
Recruiter B will get a much larger share of the recruitment commission than Recruiter A—ideally, a 70-30 split will be there.
Usually, in 360 recruitment, the recruiter handles the entire recruitment process from start to finish. This involves:
But when an account manager comes into the picture, the commission is split between the two. Here are the different scenarios:
Here’s how the commission is generally split:
Role | Commission split |
Junior Consultant | 1/3 split |
Consultant | 2/3 split (if the candidate is from a junior) |
Senior Consultant | Between 12.5% – 25 % (post surpassing threshold) |
Lead Consultant | Between 17.5% – 30% (post surpassing threshold) |
Different agencies use different recruiter commission structure plans, based on what’s right for them and their recruiters. We’ve picked some of the best commission schemes listed by The Recruitment Network (TRN).
NFI is the placement fee a recruitment agency makes from placing permanent and temporary candidates, and advertising job openings. For larger agencies, it also covers earnings from additional services like recruitment process outsourcing, consulting, and managing payrolls for other businesses.
Here’s how an agency can categorize recruiter commission percentages based on cumulative NFI:
NFI | Commission |
£0 – £100,000 | 5% |
£100,000 – £150,000 | 10% |
£150,000 – £200,000 | 20% |
£200,000 – £250,000 | 40% |
Gross margin is the difference between what the client is charged for the recruiter’s work and the cost to the business of paying the recruiter. In this commission scheme, you pay a percentage of the Gross Margin attributable to you.
Gross margin per month | Commission |
£0-£18,000 | 11% |
£18,001+ | 12.5% |
Unlike the above two examples, this commission scheme is based on the total revenue generated from placements. It doesn’t include associated costs or profit margins. Since this scheme is highly dependent on the threshold and total billing is done every month, it varies for each role.
Role | Threshold | Commission split | Commission range |
Junior Consultant | £6000 | 1/3 of the total billing if they source the candidate | 7.5% – 15% |
Consultant | £9999 | 2/3 split of the fee if the candidate is from a junior | 10% – 25% |
Senior Consultant | £12,499 | – | 12% – 25% |
Lead Consultant | £20,000 | – | 17.5% – 30% |
In this scheme, you only pay the commission when the entire team hits their individual targets and every member’s operating cost is met. It’s a billing-based structure where the banked monies are split between lead and support recruiters for their effort and success.
Role | Basic salary | On-target earnings (OTE) |
Trainee Recruitment Consultant | £20,000 | 100% target: £21,200 125% target: £23,150 150% target: £27,500 |
Junior Recruitment Consultant | £22,000 | 100% target: £24,400 125% target: £27,850 150% target: £35,500 |
Recruitment Consultant | £25,000 basic | 100% target: £27,400 125% target: £31,300 150% target: £40,000 |
Senior Recruitment Consultant | £33,000 | 100% target: £47,400 125% target: £57,300 150% target: £67,200 |
Recruitment Manager | £35,000 | 100% target: £49,400 125% target: £60,200 150% target: £71,000 |
Creating a recruiter commission structure can be daunting at first. But, with the right resources and understanding, you can always build a system to reward your best-performing recruiters!
Remember, commission structures are not one-size-fits-all. Tailor your approach to fit your organizational goals, team dynamics, and individual motivations.
Now, go on. Apply these insights and build a commission structure that not only rewards hard work but also fosters a culture of excellence!