{"id":26066,"date":"2026-09-07T10:47:31","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T10:47:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/recruiterflow.com\/blog\/?p=26066"},"modified":"2026-09-07T11:09:02","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T11:09:02","slug":"spott-vs-recruiterflow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/recruiterflow.com\/blog\/spott-vs-recruiterflow\/","title":{"rendered":"Spott vs Recruiterflow: We fact-checked the fact-check"},"content":{"rendered":"

Lost & Found: We Finally Found Where Our 7-Year-Old UI Went. Spott Is Still Using It To Review Us In 2026!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Spott’s comparison page \u2014 updated as of July 2026 \u2014 deliberately misinterprets Recruiterflow by using outdated product screenshots of Recruiterflow. Not slightly outdated. Seven years old!<\/p>\n

That isn’t a product comparison. It’s an archaeological dig.<\/p>\n

\n

It’s like showing someone a photograph of a construction site and calling it a review of the finished building.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Old screenshots are one thing. But once we checked the claims behind them, the bigger problem became clear: some are outdated, some omit important context, and some are directly contradicted by what can be verified today.<\/p>\n

We would’ve ignored it, but our customers, prospects, and well-wishers keep flagging it. So here we are.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

CONTENTS<\/p>\n<\/span><\/div>\n